Man Gives Generally His Monetary Data To artificial intelligence, Cases He Had the option To Save...

He claimed that by automating AutoGPT tasks that would have otherwise taken up valuable time, he was able to save $217.85 (Rs 17,850).

Joshua Browder, the Chief of robot legal counselor startup DoNotPay has uncovered that he gave over his whole monetary life to OpenAI's GPT-4 trying to set aside cash. He claimed that by automating tasks to AutoGPT that would have taken up valuable time otherwise, he was able to save $217.85 (Rs 17,850). He shared his experience in a Twitter thread, claiming that the chatbot has assisted him in numerous ways in recovering money that has been lost or not claimed.








"I made the decision to outsource my entire personal financial life to GPT-4 (via the the@donotpay chat that we are constructing)." I gave AutoGPT admittance to my bank, budget summaries, credit report, and email. He wrote in the thread, "Here's how it's going so far (+$217.85) and the strange ways it's saving money."

Joshua Browder @jbrowder1  Follow I've decided to outsource all of my personal financial affairs to GPT-4 (through the @donotpay chat we're building).


AutoGPT was granted access to my email, bank, financial statements, and credit report.


The strange ways it is saving money and how it is going so far (plus $217.85) are listed here. 1/n):

12:30 AM  April 30, 2023 

Read the full conversation on Twitter 18.8K Replies

The bot scanned over 10,000 transactions after AutoGPT was given access to his bank account and financial statements. It discovered that he was paying $80.86 per month for useless subscriptions and offered to cancel each one.

After engaging in an automated conversation with agents, the bot used the USPS Lob API to cancel the gym subscriptions.


Replying to @jbrowder1
I asked it to scan the same transactions and find me one where I could get an easy refund. From my email, it identified a United Airlines In-Flight WiFI Receipt for $36.99 from London to New York. It then asked me: “did it work properly?”
When I said: “no,” it immediately drafted a persuasive and firm legal letter to United, requesting a refund. The letter was both legalistic (citing FTC statutes) and convincing. A bot then sent it to them via their website. Within 48 hours, United agreed to refund (+$36.99).
He also received simple refunds thanks to the bot. The bot inquired as to whether Browder's email contained a United Airlines in-flight Wi-Fi receipt for $36.99 from London to New York. When he said "no," a persuasive and firm legal letter requesting a refund was immediately written and sent to United.
Also Read